XIE Jingjing
Modern Agriculture. 2025, 50(6): 33-45.
Agricultural supply-side structural reform is a key measure and inevitable path for promoting the sustainable and healthy development of agriculture in the new era. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities(directly under the central government)in China(excluding Tibet Autonomous Region, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan regions)from 2010 to 2023, this study adopted the improved CRITIC-entropy weight method, Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method, and obstacle degree model to quantitatively evaluate the effect of agricultural supply-side structural reform, analyzed the spatial differences and their sources, and identified the main obstacle factors. The results showed that: from 2010 to 2023, the overall effect of China′s agricultural supply-side structural reform presented a fluctuating upward trend, showing a regional growth pattern of "the central and western regions leading the growth while the eastern region lagging behind". The spatial distribution of the reform level was continuously optimized, with the number of provinces at a low level substantially reduced, provinces at a medium level slightly increased, and provinces at a high level remarkably increased; . The overall spatial difference in the reform effect showed a continuous narrowing trend, with the difference mainly derived from super variable density, followed by intra-regional differences, and finally inter-regional differences. The intra-regional differences in the eastern and western regions decreased, while the intra-regional differences in the central region showed an expanding trend, the inter-regional differences between the eastern and western regions decreased significantly, while the inter-regional differences between the eastern and central regions increased. The reform effect faced common constraints across regions, and the coverage depth of agricultural insurance, per capita output of commercial crops, and agricultural credit level were the three core obstacle factors affecting the improvement of the reform effect. Accordingly, it is suggested to continue deepening the agricultural supply side structural reform, strengthen agricultural insurance and credit services, optimize the agricultural production layout, and coordinate the safeguarding of food security and enhance the value of characteristic industries.