Study on the Impact of Environmental Attention on Agricultural Carbon Emissions&#x02014;&#x02014;Based on the Dual Perspective of Government and Public

PDF(1304 KB)

Modern Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 102-112.

Study on the Impact of Environmental Attention on Agricultural Carbon Emissions——Based on the Dual Perspective of Government and Public

LI Zheng, TAN Renyuan, SHEN Chuanshun

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This paper utilized panel data of 30 provinces, autonomous regions and cities (except Xizang Autonomous Region, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) from 2010 to 2019, to measure the degree of coupling coordination between government and public environmental attention. It empirically tested their impacts on agricultural carbon emissions and the mechanisms. The results revealed that the increase in government and public environmental attention could suppress agricultural carbon emissions, with the inhibitory effect of government environmental attention being greater than that of public environmental attention. Further analysis indicated there was regional heterogeneity in the impacts of government and public environmental attention on agricultural carbon emissions. Both types of attention suppressed agricultural carbon emissions by promoting formal and informal environmental regulations. Consequently, this paper suggested differentiated strategies for adjusting environmental attention.

Key words

government environmental attention / public environmental attention / agricultural carbon emission / coupling coordination model

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LI Zheng, TAN Renyuan, SHEN Chuanshun. Study on the Impact of Environmental Attention on Agricultural Carbon Emissions——Based on the Dual Perspective of Government and Public[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2024, 49(5): 102-112

References

[1] 新华社. 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于构建现代环境治理体系的指导意见》[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2020(8):11-14.
[2] 文宏,杜菲菲.注意力、政策动机与政策行为的演进逻辑——基于中央政府环境保护政策进程(2008—2015年)的考察[J].行政论坛,2018,25(2):80-87.
[3] 郭进,徐盈之.公众参与环境治理的逻辑、路径与效应[J].资源科学,2020,42(7):1372-1383.
[4] SIMON HA.Administrative behavior:A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations [M].New York:Free Press,1947.
[5] OCASIO W.Towards an attention-based view of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18:187-206.
[6] 王家峰. 认真对待民主治理中的注意力——评《再思民主政治中的决策制定:注意力、选择和公共政策》[J].公共行政评论,2013,6(5):144-154.
[7] OCASIO W.Attention to attention[J].Organization Science,2011,22(5):1286-1296.
[8] 王印红,李萌竹.地方政府生态环境治理注意力研究——基于30个省市政府工作报告(2006—2015)文本分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(2):28-35.
[9] 张坤鑫. 地方政府注意力与环境政策执行力的倒U形关系研究[J].公共管理评论,2021,3(4):132-161.
[10] 卢新海,陶向前,匡兵,等.环保考核、政府环境注意力与城市土地绿色利用效率[J].中国土地科学, 2023,37(8):104-112.
[11] 申伟宁,柴泽阳,张韩模.异质性生态环境注意力与环境治理绩效——基于京津冀《政府工作报告》视角[J].软科学,2020,34(9):65-71.
[12] 官永彬,谢正蕾.高质量发展下中国区域环境效率的实证测度、时空特征及影响因素研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022,42(1):5-18.
[13] 李欣,杨朝远,曹建华.网络舆论有助于缓解雾霾污染吗?——兼论雾霾污染的空间溢出效应[J].经济学动态,2017(6):45-57.
[14] 李佳佳. “双碳”目标下网络舆论对碳排放的影响——基于链式多重中介模型的影响路径分析[J].城市问题,2023(3):38-47.
[15] 石晶,崔丽娟.舆论支持对集体行动的影响:有中介的调节效应[J].心理研究,2016,9(1):72-78.
[16] 张品良. 网络虚拟社会环境下的舆论危机管理[J].江西财经大学学报,2012(1):109-115.
[17] 胡敏中. 论价值共识[J].哲学研究,2008(7):96-102.
[18] 张保伟. 利益、价值与认知视域下的环境冲突及其伦理调适[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):154-159.
[19] 彭宁,周茜,冷品逸,等.“双碳”目标下我国政府与公众双重治理的空间溢出效应分析[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(10):216-226.
[20] 陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J].经济研究,2018,53(2):20-34.
[21] 张国兴,雷慧敏,马嘉慧,等.公众参与对污染物排放的影响效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(6):29-38.
[22] 张扬,李涵,赵正豪.中国粮食作物种植变化对省际农业碳排放量的影响研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(7):29-38.
[23] 伍芬琳,李琳,张海林,等.保护性耕作对农田生态系统净碳释放量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007(12):2035-2039.
[24] 段华平,张悦,赵建波,等.中国农田生态系统的碳足迹分析[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):203-208.
[25] 朱希刚. 我国“九五”时期农业科技进步贡献率的测算[J].农业经济问题,2002,23(5):12-13.
[26] 李强. 产业升级与生态环境优化耦合度评价及影响因素研究——来自长江经济带108个城市的例证[J].现代经济探讨,2017(10):71-78.