传统meta分析中文献质量评价工具的合理选择

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2023.04.014

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2590 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要临床研究文献的质量评价是meta分析的重要内容。本文对研究方法学质量（偏倚风险）评价工具进行了梳理，介绍了随机对照试验和非随机干预性研究常用评价工具，并结合案例，归纳分析常见误用情况，为合理选择文献质量评价工具提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	许吉
	邓宏勇

关键词 ： meta分析, 文献质量评价, 偏倚风险, 评价工具

Abstract：The quality evaluation of clinical research literature is an important aspect of metaanalysis. In this article, we provide a review of research methodological quality (risk of bias) evaluation tools, introduce commonly used evaluation tools for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized intervention studies, and summarize common misuse cases through case analyses. This provides a reference for the rational selection of literature quality evaluation tools.

Key words： meta-analysis literature quality assessment risk of bias assessment tool

收稿日期: 2023-05-18

通讯作者: 邓宏勇，Email: denghy@shutcm.edu.cn

引用本文:

许吉，邓宏勇. 传统meta分析中文献质量评价工具的合理选择[J]. 中国医院统计, 2023, 30(4): 309-311.
Xu Ji, Deng Hongyong. Quality assessment tools of study for meta-analysis. journal1, 2023, 30(4): 309-311.

链接本文:

http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2023.04.014 或 http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/CN/Y2023/V30/I4/309

［1］GREENLAND S, ROTHMAN K. Comprar modern epidemiology［M］. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

［2］BADGLEY R F. An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals［J］. Can Med Assoc J, 1961, 85(5):246-250.

［3］杨智荣，孙凤，詹思延．偏倚风险评估系列：(一)概述［J］．中华流行病学杂志，2017，38(7)：983-987．DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.07.027.

［4］JADAD A R, MOORE R A, CARROLL D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?［J］. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.

［5］HIGGINS J P T, GREEN S. Cochrane Handbook for Systemic reviews of Interventions:Version 5.0［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.

［6］HIGGINS J P T, STERNE J A C, SAVOVIC〖DD(-*2〗′〖DD)〗 J, et al. A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials［M］//CHANDLER J, MCKENZIE J, BOUTRON I, et al. Cochrane Methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016: S29-S31.

［7］STERNE J A, HERNN M A, REEVES B C, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions［J］. BMJ, 2016, 355:i4919. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.

［8］WELLS G A, SHEA B, O′CONNELL D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in Meta0analyses［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

［9］DOWNS S H, BLACK N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions［J］. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1998, 52(6):377-384. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.

［10］Critical Appraisal Checklists［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists.

［11］JBI. Critical Appraisal Tools［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools.

［12］NIH. Study Quality Assessment Tools［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.

［13］HIGGINS J P T, ALTMAN D G, GTZSCHE P C, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration′s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials［J］. BMJ, 2011, 343:d5928. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

［14］Risk of bias tools［EB/OL］.［2023-05-14］. https://www.riskofbias.info/.

［15］孙凤，高乐，杨智荣，等．偏倚风险评估系列：(五)非随机干预性研究［J］．中华流行病学杂志，2018，39(3)：51．DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.03.024.