Abstract：Objective To establish the intervention measures of breast cancer quality of care, to analyze the influence of the intervention measures on the utilization rate of he indicators for breast cancer,and to provide theoretical guidance for improving the quality of care for breast cancer. Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer were included in this study and the utilization rates of each quality indicator were calculated. Intervention measures were established based on the results of evaluation and the intervention was executed twice within 35 months. The change of utilization rate of indicators before and after the intervention was estimated using interrupted time series. Results We obtained 3282 eligible patients and evaluated the quality of care for breast cancer based on nine indicators.The intervention measures included information feedback and conference intervention. The level of utilization rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased by 25.52% (P=0.003) and the utilization rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy showed an ascending trend by 1.12%per month after the initial intervention.The utilization rate of at least 10 axillary lymph node dissections showed an aseending trend by 1.37% per month after the second intervention.Conclusion The compliance of sentinel lymph node biopsy and at least 10 axillary lymph node dissections can be improved by the evaluation of treatment quality and the implementation of intervention measures. The evaluation of treatment quality based on intervention studies can improve the utilization rate of quality indicators,avoid postoperative comorbidities,reduce postoperative recurrence rate,and improve the quality of eare for breast cancer.
包晓蔷，栗景坤，田园，刘梦洋，刘美娜. 基于干预研究的乳腺癌治疗质量评价[J]. 中国医院统计, 2020, 27(3): 246-250.
Bao Xiaoqiang,Li Jingkun,Tian Yuan,Liu Mengyang,Liu Meina.. Evaluation on treatment quality of breast cancer based on intervention studies . journal1, 2020, 27(3): 246-250.
[1]TANVETYANON T,LEE J H,FULP W J,et al.Changes in thecare of non-small-cell lung cancer after audit and feedback:the Florida initiative for quality cancer care[J]. J Oncol Pract, 2014,10(4):e247-254.
[2]DONABEDLAN A.Evaluating the quality of medical care[J].MilbankMem Fund Q,1966,44(3):166-206.
[3]MENDELSON A,KONDO K,DAMBERG C,et al.The effects ofpay-for-performance programs on health,health care use,and processes of care:a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2017,166:341-353.
[4]WANG Y L,LIZ X,, ZHAO X Q,et al. Effect of a Multifaceted Quality Improvement Intervention on Hospital Personnel Adherence to Performance Measures in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in China:A Randomized Clinical Trial.[J].JAMA,2018，320(3):245-254.
[5]PIRKLE C M,DUMONT A,TRAORE M,et al.Effect of a facility-based multifaceted intervention on the quality of obstetrical care:acluster randomized controlled trial in Mali and Senegal[J].BMCPregnancy and Childbirth,2013:13-24.
[6]BAO H,YANG F,WANG X,et al.Developing a set of quality indicators for breast cancer care in China[J].International Journal for Quality in Health Care,2015,27(4):291-296.
[7]PENFOLD R B,ZHANG F.Use of Interrupted Time Series Analysisin Evaluating Health Care Quality Improvements[J].Academic pediatrics,2013，13:538-544.
[8]GUTHRIE B,ROLAND M,MINCHIN M.Quality of Care in the U-nited Kingdom after Removal of Financial Incentives [J].The newengland journal o f medicine,2018,379:948-957.
[9] 薛云，谢宇，刘博，等.我国典型地区公立医院薪酬改革进展比较研究[J].中国医院管理，2018,38（4）:5-7.
[10]邵华，王琦琦，胡跃华，等.中断时间序列分析及其在公共卫生领域中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志，2015,36（9）：1015-1017.
[11]郭广香，胡国超，韦超.早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术的临床应用价值[J].深圳中西医结合杂志，2019,29（15)：56-57.
[12]覃鸿生.乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫数目与患者预后的相关性研究[J].当代医学，2012,18（32）:73-74.
