Abstract：Objective To investigate the infection control of PDCA cycle management measures in patients with type I clean incision surgery. Methods Totally 253 patients were selected from August 2015 to April 2017 in our hospital as the research objects, and according to the random number table method, they were randomly divided into the observation group of 127 patients and the control group of 126 patients. The control group was intervened with conventional infection control measures, and the observation group adopted PDCA circulation management measures. The infection and the use of antibiotics of the two groups were observed and recorded, the qualified rates of disinfection of the surfaces of objects, air, thermostat and medical staff were recorded and compared. Results The qualified rate of non-sterile surface disinfection in the observation group was about 91.34%, the qualified rate of hand disinfection in the observation group was about 98.43%, the qualified rates of indoor air and incubator in the observation group was significantly higher than those of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total infection rate of the observation group was about 3.15%, and the total infection rate in the control group was about 9.52%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The use rate of antimicrobial agents in the patients with different surgical types was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion PDCA cycle management measures are ideal for infection control in patients with type I clean incision surgery. There is a high rate of disinfection in the operating room, air and medical staff and the usage rate of antibiotics decreases. The infection reduces and the quality of infection control is high.
陈慧瑛. PDCA循环管理措施对手术室Ⅰ类清洁切口手术患者的感染控制效果分析[J]. 中国医院统计, 2018, 25(1): 36-39.
Chen Huiying. Analysis of infection control in patients with class I cleansing surgery of operating room by PDCA circulation management. journal1, 2018, 25(1): 36-39.
