|
|
Current status and influencing factors of social support among medical staff under the COVID-19 epidemic |
Zhang Xiaohong1, Zhang Chuanmeng2, Yu Ping3. |
1.Outpatient Department, Taizhou People′s Hospital, Taizhou 225300, China;
2.Central Laboratory, Taizhou People′s Hospital, Taizhou 225300, China;
3.Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China. |
|
|
Abstract Objective To understand the current status of social support for medical staff in the epidemic of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and explore its influencing factors, in order to improve the social support of medical staff and provide a scientific basis for improving their physical and mental health. Methods General information questionnaires and social support rating scale (SSRS) were used to conduct an online questionnaire survey on 707 medical staff in 6 secondary and higher hospitals in Taizhou to understand the current social support status of medical staff in the epidemic situation. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors. Results The recovery rate of the effective questionnaires was 98.16%, and the total score of the social support scale of 694 medical staff was (35.20±7.33), which was not statistically different from the domestic norm score (34.56±3.73) (P=0.335). Medical staff with old age, high professional title and high family income per capita and married had higher total scores of social support, subjective support dimensions, and objective support dimensions than others (P<0.05); the total score of social support, the scores of subjective support dimension and objective support dimension, and support utilization dimension score of medical staff without fear of new coronary pneumonia, without sense of conscious uselessness, and with high sleep quality were higher than those in other groups (P<0.05). The analysis results of the influencing factors of low-level social support of medical staff showed that married medical workers (OR=0.25, 95%CI: 0.10-0.62) and those with high sleep quality (OR=0.34, 95%CI: 0.11-1.00) were less likely to obtain low level of social support, which was a protective factor. Conscious uselessness (OR=2.59, 95% CI: 0.93-7.19) was a risk factor. Conclusion Under the epidemic situation, medical staff had received due social support, and there were many influencing factors. Emphasis should be placed on the social support of medical staff who are unmarried/ divorced, poor sleep quality or have a strong sense of uselessness to better meet the needs of their physical and mental health.
|
Received: 13 July 2020
|
|
|
|
[1]ZHU N, ZHANG D Y, WANG W L, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(8):727-733.
[2]POHL J S, WOODS N F. Don′t give up on social support: A topic of inquiry important for a healthy society[J]. Menopause, 2019, 26(7):691-693.
[3]郑京晶,陈曲,孟开,等.北京市三级甲等医院青年医护人员社会支持现状与影响因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(20):33-38.
[4]李丽娜,张郢,宴丽娟,等.社会支持对赴川救灾医护人员替代性创伤的影响[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(28):3282-3285.
[5]肖水源. 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 1994,4(2): 98-100.
[6]刘静, 陆小英, 张玲, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情应急响应医院护理管理体系的建立和运行[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(2): 1-4.
[7]史宏睿,陕柏峰,李正,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离病区护士社会支持现状及影响因素调查分析[J].浙江医学,2020,42(8):825-827.
[8]赵浴光,李晓璇,崔莹,等.社会支持对医护人员职业倦怠的影响:基于自我效能的中介作用研究[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(11):48-50. |
[1] |
Wang Zhe, Song Yang. Application study on dietary intervention combined with psychological development training in the practice for patients with impaired glucose regulation[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(4): 293-296. |
[2] |
Lü Yuying. Correlation between social support level and posttraumatic stress disorder in surgical inpatients[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(3): 215-217. |
[3] |
Xu Fei, Zhang Ying, He Huiping, Liu Jinwei. Relationship of quality of life, social support and life events in menopausal women[J]. journal1, 2017, 24(5): 336-339. |
[4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(3): 204-206. |
[5] |
Zou Chenjun, Zhang Yingzhong, Liu Zhiwang, Tao Changlin. Study on extent and correlated influencing factors of cognitive function injury of depressed elderly patients[J]. journal1, 2017, 24(1): 34-36. |
|
|
|
|