|
|
Intervention effect evaluation on septic shock patients carrying out comprehensive intervention |
Huang Danhong, Yao Liping, Shang Qinfen |
Emergency Department of Luqiao Hospital of Enze Medical Center, Taizhou 318050, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the intervention effect of septic shock patients carrying out comprehensive intervention measures. Methods Eighy-four septic shock patients were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, respectively 42 cases. The control group was given usual care measures, while the intervention group was carried out comprehensive nursing intervention measures. The indexes of persistence time of septic shock, use length of breathing machine, incidence rate of MODS, length of stay in hospital, clinical satisfaction degree and total effective rate were compared between the two groups. Results The indexes of persistence time of septic shock, use length of breathing machine, incidence rate of MODS, length of stay in hospital of the intervention group were much less than those of the control group(P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of the intervention group was 90.5% (38/42), much higher than that of the control group (25/42(59.5%), P<0.01). The total effective rate of the intervention group was 88.1%(37/42), much better than that of the control group (66.7%(28/42), P<0.05). Conclusion The carrying out of comprehensive nursing intervention measures for septic shock patients might obviously improve patient′s condition, raise clinical curative effect and treatment satisfaction degree, and cut down length of stay in hospital.
|
Received: 06 August 2016
|
|
|
|
[1] 黄群,周凯云.护理干预对预防感染性休克并发多器官功能障碍综合征的效果观察[J].当代护士,2012,12(2):97-99. [2] 俞建娣,赵伟英,王志娟,等.综合性护理在ICU感染性休克患者中的应用效果分析[J].中华医学感染学杂志,2016,7(2):306-308. [3] 黎雪连,单浩洪,黎小满,等.综合护理干预在ICU脓毒性休克患者中的应用效果观察[J].现代医药卫生,2014,30(12):1859-1960. [4] 管晓晓,颜默磊.综合性护理干预对重症监护病房感染性休克患者治疗效果的影响[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(3):90-93. [5] 区燕云,董秋林,陈世春,等.60例感染性休克致多脏器功能障碍综合征患者的抢救与护理[J].天津护理,2013,21(3):206-207. [6] DNSER MW, TAKALA J, UIMER H, et al. Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2009,35(7):1225-1233. [7] 边竟,郑红梅,熊晓美,等.护理干预对感染性休克患者液体复苏的影响[J].湖北医药学院学报,2011,30(4):428-430. [8] 胡安.早期目标导向治疗脓毒性休克病人的护理[J].护理研究,2013,27(18):1868-1869. [9] 韩根良.降钙素原及N 末端钠尿肽前体在老年脓毒性休克病情评估的临床应用研究[J].中国实验诊断学,2013,17(12):2207-2209. [10]苗楠,皮秀梅,克依木,等.ICU感染性休克病死危险因素及相应的临床治疗措施分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(9):52-53. |
[1] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(2): 120-121. |
[2] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(1): 42-43. |
[3] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(1): 49-51. |
[4] |
Wang Dandan, Dai Wenzhen, Liu Fang. Effectiveness evaluation of early HP combined with CVVH treating acute paraquat poisoning[J]. journal1, 2016, 23(6): 433-435. |
[5] |
. [J]. journal1, 2016, 23(6): 418-420. |
[6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2016, 23(6): 441-442. |
|
|
|
|