滨州市法定传染病医疗机构报告数据准确性及影响因素分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2022.06.005

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4015 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Guide

Abstract Objective To understand the status quo of reporting quality and management of the notifiable infectious diseases in Binzhou, and to find out problems in the work, so as to provide theoretical basis for standardizing reporting management and improving the reporting quality.Methods Stratified random sampling method was used to select 97 medical institutions in Binzhou City to investigate the reporting quality and management status of notifiable infectious diseases. Qualitative data were described by frequency and constituent ratio/rate (%), and differences between groups were analyzed by chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.Results From 2017 to 2020, more than 90% of medical institutions carried out self-examination of infectious disease reporting every year, and the proportion of medical institutions carrying out training related to infectious disease increased year by year. There were statistical differences among different levels and different categories of medical institutions in terms of the under-reporting rate, timeliness rate, integrity rate, accuracy and the integrity rate of valid identification of infectious disease reporting (P＜0.05). Full-time staff, regular training of infectious disease management knowledge for medical staff, regular self-examination of infectious disease reporting quality, implementation of electronic medical record management, abnormal results feedback records in imaging departments, abnormal results feedback record in laboratory departments were independent influencing factors of infectious disease reporting quality (P<0.05).Conclusion The important measures to improve the quality of infectious disease reporting are to provide special funds, ensure the stability of professional team, strengthen the training of infectious disease reporting standards and diagnostic standards, strengthen the standardized management of infectious disease network direct reporting, perfect the infectious disease reporting system, and accelerate the construction of surveillance reporting information.

Key words： management of notifiable infectious disease reporting notifiable infectious disease influencing factor Binzhou

Received: 24 July 2022

PACS:

Fund:

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Yunlan
	Wang Junhua
	Luo Weihua
	Ding Yuanjiang
	Guo Hui

Cite this article:

Zhang Yunlan,Wang Junhua,Luo Weihua, et al. Analysis of the accuracy and influencing factors of the data reported by the hospitals of notifiable infectious diseases in Binzhou[J]. journal1, 2022, 29(6): 428-434.

URL:

http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2022.06.005 OR http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/Y2022/V29/I6/428

［1］戴启刚，李媛，胡建利，等．2009—2011年江苏省传染病报告与管理工作质量评估及影响因素探讨［J］．疾病监测，2013，28(7)：575-578．DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2013.7.017.

［2］邱琳，朱妮，张雪雷，等．应用加权秩和比法综合评价陕西省医疗机构的传染病报告质量［J］．现代预防医学，2017，44(5)：926-930．

［3］王荣华，刘志涛，郝林会，等．2008年云南省传染病网络直报质量分析［J］．疾病监测，2009，24(12)：964-966．

［4］刘润友，许军红，谭柯，等．2007—2008年四川省医疗机构法定传染病漏报情况调查分析［J］．现代预防医学，2011，38(9)：1653-1655．

［5］张艺馨，曹杰，雷杰，等．2017年度山东省医疗机构法定传染病报告质量分析［J］．预防医学论坛，2018，24(11)：813-816．DOI:10.16406/j.pmt.issn.1672-9153.2018.11.006.

［6］王媛媛，谢国祥．2014—2018年南京市医疗机构法定传染病报告管理现状［J］．华南预防医学，2021，47(3)：346348．

［7］朱敏，向伦辉，袁国平，等．2015年上海市宝山区传染病报告质量和管理现状调查［J］．河南预防医学杂志，2017，28(2)：132-134．DOI:10.13515/j.cnki.hnjpm.1006-8414.2017.02.018.

［8］杜淑杰．赤峰市2014年医疗机构传染病报告质量调查［J］．疾病监测与控制，2016，10(4)：283-284．

［9］黄夏萍，郭亮永，徐斌，等．南宁市2014年基层医疗卫生机构传染病报告质量和管理现状调查［J］．中国初级卫生保健，2016，30(4)：57-58．DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2016.04.0023.

［10］刘建明，凌莉，彭丹心，等．医院传染病报告信息化对疫情报告质量影响的评价分析［J］．中华医院感染学杂志，2009，19(24)：3330-3332．