|
|
|
| nvestigation and analysis of KAP status of clinical medical staff under the management of DRGs |
| Wang Zunhui, Li Caixue |
| Hangzhou Children′s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To understand the KAP status of clinical medical staff under DRGs, and to provide reference for the operation efficiency of hospital DRGs.Methods A self-designed KAP questionnaire was used to investigate the clinical staff in a children′s hospital of Hangzhou, and the influencing factors of questionnaire scores were analyzed by t-test, single factor-analysis- of variance and multiple linear regression with the 25th version of SPSS.Results Two hundred and seventy-two people participated in the survey, including 107 doctors, 116 nurses and 49 medical technicians, with a median age of 32 (28,37) years old, and 183 people participated in the DRGs related knowledge training on the first page of medical records with an average total score (11.01±2.24). There were statistically significant differences in all variable groups except gender (Ｐ<0.05). The scoring rate of knowledge, attitude and practice were 27.55%, 71.45% and 71.22% respectively. There were significant differences (Ｐ<0.05) in knowledge score among different age, educational background, professional level, working years, training times and questionnaire filling time, and the score increased with the increase of variable value. There were statistical differences for raining times and educational background (Ｐ<0.05) on the total score in multivariate analysis. It was the primary factor affecting learning that there were too many DRG versions and concepts were difficult to understand, and most people want to learn via online video courses.Conclusion We should carry out targeted multichannel training, improve the scheme of performance distribution, and stimulate the subjective initiative of the personnel, so as to form correct beliefs, carry out positive practice, and promote the promotion and application of DRGs in hospitals.
|
|
Received: 06 February 2022
|
|
|
|
| ［1］黄昊,张丽,王颖,等.主要诊断选择对DRG入组和权重变化的影响［J］.中华医院管理杂志,2020,36(2):108-112.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2020.02.005.
［2］邓小虹.北京DRGs系统的研究与应用［M］.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2015.[ZK)]
［3］国家卫生计生委办公厅. 国家卫生计生委办公厅关于印发住院病案首页数据填写质量规范(暂行)和住院病案首页数据质量管理与控制指标(2016版)的通知:国卫办医发〔2016〕24号［EB/OL］.(2016-05-31)［2022-01-27］.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=fa8a993ec972456097a2a47379276f03.
［4］郑建,张一鹏.临床医务人员对DRGs认知的调查分析［J］.医院管理论坛,2018,35(2):20-22.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9069.2018.02.005.
［5］吴胤歆.我国疾病诊断相关分组权威版本分组设计的比较及启示［J］.中华医院管理杂志,2020,36(12):983-987.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20200702-01579.
［6］陈志华,杨杰,杨晓东,等.医院中层干部对DRGs管理相关知识的认知度调查［J］.现代实用医学,2021,33(7):921-922.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2021.07.037.
［7］温少东,李丞,尼日格日勒,等.DRG在医院科室绩效考核中的实践应用［J］.中国卫生经济,2018,37(9):74-76.DOI:10.7664/CHE20180918. |
| [1] |
Zhang Hongcheng, Li Shengli, Xu kai. Study on the standard hospitalization cost of insurance patients with digestive system based on diagnosis related groups[J]. journal1, 2021, 28(5): 426-428. |
| [2] |
Liu Jiyang, Shen Yang. Screening effect of DRGs detection software on the first page of medical records[J]. journal1, 2021, 28(5): 477-480. |
| [3] |
Li Yongfeng，Yu Chuhong. Analysis of influencing factors of hospitalization expenses for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on diagnosis related groups[J]. journal1, 2021, 28(4): 339-342. |
| [4] |
Su Yunxia, Li Xiaoxue, Wu Yingying, Wang Yuehong, Xu Xiaoxia, Wang Xian. Investigation and analysis on the use of monosialotetrahexosylganglioside sodium in 764 inpatients[J]. journal1, 2021, 28(3): 232-237. |
| [5] |
He Liping, Zheng Lijiao, Liu Yuanting.. Evaluation of the effect of bed allocation by using indicators of diagnosis related groups .[J]. journal1, 2021, 28(2): 175-180. |
| [6] |
Xu Mengqiu, Ding Liping.. Discussion on diagnosis related groups of prostatic cancer based on hospitalization expenses[J]. journal1, 2020, 27(5): 416-419. |
|
|
|
|
