|
|
|
| Study on effect comparison between implantable venous access port and peripherally inserted central catheter of chemotherapy patients of breast cancer |
| Wang Yuling, Ma Zhaosheng, Lin Jiao, Wu Lili |
| Breast Thyroid Surgery of Taizhou Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Taizhou 317000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect comparison between implantable venous access port (IVAP) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) of chemotherapy patients of breast cancer.Methods 240 cases of radical mastectomy were randomly divided into PICC group and IVAP group, 120 cases each group. PICC group was given PICC catheterization method, and IVAP group was adopted IVAP Catheterization. The indexes of success rate of puncture, catheterization time, incidence rate of complications, comfort degree, nursing satisfaction degree and life quality were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistical significance about success rate of the first puncture between the two groups (P>0.05). The catheterization time in the IVAP group was longer than the PICC group (P<0.01). The incidence rate of complications in the IVAP group was 8.33%, lower than the PICC group (P<0.01). The scores of comfort degree and life quality in the IVAP group were both lower than the PICC group (P<0.01), but the score of nursing satisfaction degree in the IVAP group was higher than the PICC group (P<0.01).Conclusion Contrast with PICC method, chemotherapy patients of breast cancer use of IVAP method, it could extend catheterization time, cut down incidence rate of complications, raise comfort degree and satisfaction degree, and improve life quality of prognosis.
|
|
Received: 30 November 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 毕铁强,周军,汪瑞,等.完全植入式静脉输液港与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管在乳腺癌患者化疗中的应用效果比较[J].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2014,8(2):103-108.
[2] 刘鹏程,孙皎,张欢欢,等.乳腺癌病人植入式静脉输液港与PICC应用效果比较的Meta分析[J].护理研究,2017,31(4):449-455.
[3] 王邓超,林瑞娇,张再重,等.植入式静脉输液港与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管在乳腺癌辅助化疗中的应用比较[J].中华内分泌外科杂志,2014,8(2):120-122.
[4] 郭凌云,田富国,米媛媛,等.静脉植入式输液港与经外周-静脉置入中心静脉导管输液途径在乳腺癌不同治疗期的应用研究[J].中国药物与临床,2017,17(1):147-149.
[5] 魏晓琳,邢鹏,李丽莉.植入式输液港与PICC 在乳腺癌化疗中的应用的比较[J].中国医科大学学报,2015,44(5):476-477.
[6] 文砚芳,万笑.植入静脉输液港与PICC在乳腺癌化疗患者中的效果分析[J].护理实践与研究,2018,15(4):132-133.
[7] 李帆,朱瑞仪,官莉,等.静脉输液港在我国乳腺癌化疗患者中的应用及研究进展[J].解放军护理杂志,2018,35(2):44-48.
[8] 刘叶.植入式静脉输液港与PICC在乳腺癌患者中应用的效果比较[J].中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(18):1413-1416.
[9] 王虹,刘晓娟,冷育清,等.年轻乳腺癌化疗患者应用植入式静脉输液港的临床观察及护理对策[J].海南医学,2015,26(21):3274-3276.
[10]王玉玲,王伟文,娄幼幼,等.植入式静脉输液港在乳腺癌患者60例中的应用护理[J].中国乡村医药,2015,22(1):77.
[11]宾莲洁,张爱玲,叶建森,等.植入式静脉输液港辅助化疗与外周静脉穿刺化疗在乳腺癌中应用效果对比[J].泰山医学学报,2017,38(9):1068-1069.
|
| [1] |
Ye Qian, Zhang Qiuju, Cong Yuxin, Li Cheng, Liu Meina. Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage T3 and T4 rectal cancer and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(2): 81-84. |
| [2] |
Bao Xianqin. COX regression analysis on influence factors of prognosis of liver primary carcinoma patients after the treatment of transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(2): 89-91. |
| [3] |
Zhu Xiaowei. Effects of spousal synchronous cognitive behavior management on perioperative mental state of patients with modified radical mastectomy[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(1): 16-18. |
| [4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(3): 215-217. |
| [5] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 133-136. |
| [6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 123-125. |
|
|
|
|
