|
|
|
| Comprehensive benefit comparison of cost monitoring indicators of 10 hospitals based on efficacy coefficient method |
| Li Tiandan, Kong Ping |
| Statistics Room, Information Center, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To solve the comprehensive benefit evaluation of different quality indicators in hospital cost monitoring through homogeneity transformation of different quality indicators of hospital cost monitoring.Methods The actual value of each monitoring index was converted into a percentage by the calculation of the efficiency coefficient method, and a reasonable amount of score could be obtained by using the same formula. Then we summarized the score.Results Of the 10 hospitals evaluated, the one with the highest comprehensive score of cost control (i.e., the best benefit) was H hospital, which ranked first with 720.94 points. The lowest comprehensive score was A hospital, ranking 10th with 620.92 points. The ranking of other hospitals was clear. Conclusion We can make an intuitive judgment on the good and bad of each monitoring index through comparing individual scores, and we can evaluate and compare the monitoring indexes of different natures by means of score summarization, and sort and evaluate the overall effect of different hospital cost control.
|
|
Received: 13 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘国柱.应用Ritid法与RSR法相结合评估广东东部6家二甲综合性医院住院病人疗效[J].中国医院统计,2017,24(2):113-114.
[2] 耿敏,周典,李娇龙,等.安徽省县级公立医院实施药品零加成现状调查[J].中国医院管理,2015,35(4):6-8.
[3] 张洪成,崔爱东,任泽强.职工医保冠心病介入治疗患者住院费用及其影响因素分析[J].中国医院统计,2015,22(2):111-113.
[4] 刘红杨,王凡,肖金环,等.某三甲医院2006—2015年传染病流行特征及其住院费用的回顾性研究[J].中国医院统计,2016,23(4):250-253.
[5] 刘建亭.关于椎间盘疾病病种住院次均费用影响因素分析[J].中国医院统计,2014,21(1):16-17. |
|
|
|
