|
|
Influence factor analysis of nasal continuous positive airway pressure stability for newborn |
Wang Weina1, Shen Ying2 |
1 Department of Neonatology, the People′s Hospital of Beilun District, Ningbo 315800, China; 2 Department of Neonatology, Binjiang District of Zhejiang University Affiliated Children's Hospital |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the influence factors of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) stability for newborn, so as to provide data evidence to promote NCPAP quality. Methods The clinical data of totally 223 cases of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome was analyzed, and all the patients were treated with NCPAP and divided into 2 groups according to pressure anomaly time: ≥3 times group and <3 times group. SPSS19.0 was used to analyze the influence factors and risk factors of pressure anomaly. Results There was 602 times pressure anomaly in total, and 2.7 times per child. The birth body mass (t=2.601, P=0.040), NCPAP use time (t=14.217, P<0.001), stuffy nose off (χ2=12.043, P=0.001), nasal mucosa damage (χ2=11.314, P=0.001), fetus restless (χ2=4.814, P=0.028), pipe line leakage (χ2=4.332, P=0.037), secreta block (χ2=6.789, P=0.009) and excessive condensate water (χ2=5.026, P=0.025) were all influence factors for NCPAP stability. NCPAP≥72(OR=2.159,95%CI:1.212~8.874), stuffy nose off(OR=3.283,95%CI: 1.643~6.558), nasal mucosa damage (OR=2.724,95%CI:1.506~1.930), fetus restless(OR=1.873,95%CI:1.066~3.291), secreta block (OR=2.419,95%CI:1.231~4.755)and excessive condensate water (OR=2.253, 95%CI:1.095~4.637)were also risk factors for NCPAP pressure anomaly. Conclusion Necessary precautions should be taken according to the risk factors of NCPAP pressure anomaly, and timely troubleshooting is the effective measure for improving NCPAP quality.
|
Received: 31 August 2017
|
|
|
|
[1] BALACHANDRAN JS, YU X, WROBLEWSKI K, et al. A Brief Survey of Patients′ First Impression after CPAP Titration Predicts Future CPAP Adherence: A Pilot Study[J]. J Clin Sleep Med,2013;9(3):199-205. [2] 吉海燕,王照云,尹同进,等.新生儿n-CPAP通气压力异常原因分析及对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2014,20(11):62-64. [3] 张昆艳.早产极低出生体重儿鼻塞持续气道正压通气与气管插管接呼吸机通气对比分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(23):3791-3793. [4] 沈晓明,王卫平.儿科学[M].7 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:110-114. [5] 皇甫秋强,陶鸿杰,费鑫法,等.持续性无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病效果分析[J].中国医院统计,2014,21(1):7-9. [6] TURNBULL CD, BRATTON DJ, CRAIG SE, et al. In patients with minimally symptomatic OSA can baseline characteristics and early patterns of CPAP usage predict those who are likely to be longer-term users of CPAP[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(2):276-281. [7] WALLACE DM, WOHLGEMUTH WK. Does Race-Ethnicity Moderate the Relationship between CPAP Adherence and Functional Outcomes of Sleep in US Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome[J]. J Clin Sleep Med, 2014, 10(10):1083-1091. [8] 钱向明,李花,李陶,等.气道灌洗联合鼻塞持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿胎粪吸入综合征79例分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2014,11(3):121-122. [9] 付春花,夏世文.经鼻间歇正压通气在初始治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的临床应用[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2014,16(05):460-464. [10]张丹靖.鼻塞式持续气道正压通气在新生儿肺透明膜病中应用不安全因素分析及护理措施[J].解放军医药杂志,2012,24(06):68-70. [11]林云,贾雁平,石霖.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征新疗法临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(24):4006-4007. [12]尹同进,吉海燕,尹萍,等.影响新生儿鼻塞持续气道正压通气压力不稳定因素分析[J].临床儿科杂志,2011,29(09):883-885. [13]战荣君,张伟红,李晓霞.影响新生儿鼻塞持续气道正压通气压力的不稳定因素分析[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(07):255-256. [14]周永红.影响新生儿鼻塞持续气道正压通气压力不稳定因素分析[J].求医问药(下半月),2012,10(12):282. [15]焦淑芳.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗小儿重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭的临床疗效及预后观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(13):2117-2118. |
[1] |
Yao Jinjiang, Xu Yongyong, Guo Lingxia, Yang Liping, Pan Jing, Zhao Qianfou, Tan Zhijun. Analysis of job satisfaction and its influence factors among medical staffs in Shaanxi province[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 81-84. |
[2] |
Zhou Cailing, Dai Jin, Ye Meiling. Investigation analysis on clinical features and risk factors of brain injury of neonatal hypoglycemia[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 93-95. |
[3] |
Kong Hongyan. Investigation on current situation and influencing factors of breastfeeding knowledge of pregnant women in a hospital from 2012 to 2016[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 96-98. |
[4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 123-125. |
[5] |
Huang Yanqun, Zhang Hui, Wang Ni, Liu Honglei, Chen Hui. Analysis of prognostic factors of cerebrovascular disease based on the national inpatient sample[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 111-114. |
[6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(2): 156-157. |
|
|
|
|