|
|
|
| Comparative analysis of ICD-10 and ICD-11 coding of primary nasal meningiomas |
| Fang Mengya, Pan Xiaoxia, Wang Yi |
| Yancheng School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Yancheng 224001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the difference between ICD-10 and ICD-11 disease coding query and composition, and to provide a better understanding and reference for the current ICD-10 correct coding.Methods Taking primary nasal meningioma as the research object, ICD-10 and ICD-11 coding were compared and analyzed in detail from the aspects of chapter structure, coding composition, site coding, morphological coding and other extended coding.Results The ICD-10 disease code of primary nasal meningioma was found, the codes found in Volume 1 were classified as brain neoplasm, which needed to be revised before they could be used. ICD-11 uses a combination of cluster coding to represent complex neoplasm coding in detail. The morphological classification of ICD-11 is more in line with the actual clinical classification. The ICD-11 extended code can reflect the severity, lateral position and neoplasm stage.Conclusion ICD-11 is conducive to more accurate statistics of medical information, which should be applied as soon as possible.
|
|
Received: 06 September 2023
|
|
|
|
| ［1］北京协和医院. 国际疾病分类修订历程与现状［EB/OL］.(2020-11-06)［2023-08-01］.https://icd11.pumch.cn/Home/AnnouncementItem?id=4&page=1.
［2］北京协和医院. ICD-11简介［EB/OL］.(2020-11-06)［2023-08-01］.https://icd11.pumch.cn/Home/AnnouncementItem?id=3&page=1.
［3］张逸，王秀兰，张继，等．原发性腹膜后异位脑膜瘤1例［J］．中华普通外科杂志，2022，37(4)：259．DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20210714-00431.
［4］赵辉，尚芳芳，刘小玲，等．鼻腔脑膜瘤1例［J］．临床与实验病理学杂志，2015(10)：1198．DOI: 10.13315/j.cnki.cjcep.2015.10.038.
［5］王芳，王海庆，刘娜，等．一例异位脑膜瘤报道并文献复习［J］．分子诊断与治疗杂志，2023，15(6)：947-950．DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6929.2023.06.011.
［6］关宏，李志红，孙吉瑞，等．2017版WHO垂体非神经内分泌肿瘤分类临床指导及国际疾病分类法编码分析［J］．中国现代神经疾病杂志，2022，22(2)：116-125．DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2022.02.010.
［7］普鑫，陈瑞春，郭如丽，等．ICD-11扩展码的特点分析［J］．医学信息，2022(11)：8-11．
［8］庞辉，刘骏峰．宫颈鳞状上皮内病变的ICD-10与ICD-11编码对比分析［J］．现代医院，2022，22(4)：567-569．
［9］王伟辉．斑痣性错构瘤病ICD-11与ICD-10的差异分析［J］．中国病案，2023，24(7)：55-57．DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2023.07.019.
|
| [1] |
Zheng Ya, Xu Minhui, Jin Ni,He Guobin, Wu Lijuan. Retrospective analysis of coded cases of obstetric breech delivery[J]. journal1, 2023, 30(6): 461-463. |
| [2] |
Pang Hui，Liu Junfeng. Comparative analysis of ICD-10 and ICD-11 coding in valvular heart disease[J]. journal1, 2023, 30(1): 71-74. |
| [3] |
Jiang Jun, Ge Linlin, Zhang Yao, Huai Jingyang, Dai Hui. Analysis of errors in disease coding using computer software system and error correction paths[J]. journal1, 2022, 29(5): 358-361. |
| [4] |
Guo Xusheng, Li Rengang, Xi Yue. Retrospective analysis of the coding quality of International Classification of Diseases for tumors in a tertiary hospital[J]. journal1, 2022, 29(3): 188-191. |
| [5] |
Rao Yi. Case analysis on ICD-10 coding for premature rupture of obstetric membranes in a hospital from January to June 2021[J]. journal1, 2022, 29(3): 179-182. |
| [6] |
Zhang Rui, Yang Fan. Application case analysis of R coding in ICD-10[J]. journal1, 2022, 29(1): 51-53. |
|
|
|
|
