|
|
|
| Analysis of rehabilitation nursing effect on patients with ICU severe craniocerebral injury based on Omaha system |
| Zhao Yufang, Zhu Beilei, Ye Mangmang |
| Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of rehabilitation nursing on patients with ICU severe craniocerebral injury based on Omaha system. Methods Totally 100 cases of ICU severe craniocerebral injury were studied in our hospital from October 2017 to October 2016. According to the end numbers of the patients' entrance ID numbers, the patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received the Omaha system intervention nursing besides routine nursing. The clinical effects, hospitalization, psychological status and satisfaction of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results The total effective rate and nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group (98%, 96%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (86%, 84%), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The hospitalization cost of the observation group was obviously lower than that of the control group, the time of hospitalization of ICU was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in SDS score and SAS score between the two groups (P>0.05). After nursing, the SDS scores and SAS scores of the two groups were significantly decreased, the SDS scores and SAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitation nursing based on Omaha system for ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury can improve treatment effect and patient satisfaction and help patients recover at an early date, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
|
|
Received: 11 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 高擎擎,黄金月,朱金萍,等.应用奥马哈系统为脑卒中患者实施社区康复护理的个案分析[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2015,35(6):834-838.
[2] 卜玲,陈顺芳,李志红.手术室护理干预对颅脑损伤患者术后医院感染的控制作用研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,25(15):3499-3500.
[3] OKONKWO DO, SHUTTER LA, MOORE C, et al.Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Phase-II: A Phase II Randomized Trial[J].Crit Care Med. 2017 ;45(11):1907-1914.
[4] 苏晓萍,张丽萍,李毅宁.奥马哈系统在泌尿造口患者延续护理中的应用和效果评价[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(4):389-394.
[5] 周晶,乔桂圆,李静芝,等.以奥马哈系统为框架的颈椎病患者延续护理[J].广东医学,2016,37(10):1585-1588.
[6] 崔璀,郑显兰,李双子.奥马哈系统在癫痫患儿护理中应用的可行性研究[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(7):804-807.
[7] 毛剑婷,黄旭芳,纪建松,等.奥马哈系统在TACE治疗中晚期肝癌患者护理中的应用效果[J].介入放射学杂志,2017,26(7):660-664.
[8] ASEHNOUNE K, SEGUIN P, LASOCKI S, et al.Extubation Success Prediction in a Multicentric Cohort of Patients with Severe Brain Injury[J].Anesthesiology. 2017,127(2):338-346.
[9] 毛凤.预见性护理措施在重症颅脑损伤患者院内转运中的应用[J].中医药管理杂志,2016,24(4):105-106.
[10]MILLER FERGUSON N, SARNAIK A, MILES D, et al.Abusive Head Trauma and Mortality-An Analysis From an International Comparative Effectiveness Study of Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury[J].Crit Care Med. 2017,45(8):1398-1407.
[11]ANDREWS PJD, RODRIGUEZ A, SUTER P, et al.Mortality Risk Stratification After Traumatic Brain Injury and Hazard of Death With Titrated Hypothermia in the Eurotherm3235Trial[J].Crit Care Med. 2017,45(5):883-890. |
| [1] |
Wu Huatun, Huang Xiaoguang, Zhu Jianqian. Effectiveness analysis on clinical pathway of common bile duct stones day surgery[J]. journal1, 2019, 26(1): 30-33. |
| [2] |
Xu Taoyan, Chen Hongyu, Wu Shuai. Analysis of disease characteristics and prognosis of ICU inpatients in a geriatric hospital[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(6): 470-473. |
| [3] |
Fang Ping, Li Na. Effect of cluster management on nursing quality of ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation under the concept of humanistic care[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(5): 367-369. |
| [4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(4): 279-280. |
| [5] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(3): 218-220. |
| [6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2018, 25(1): 67-69. |
|
|
|
|
