助产士疲劳状况和职业倦怠及离职意愿的现况调查

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2018.05.016

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (930 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the status levels of fatigue condition, job burnout, coping styles, self-efficacy and turnover intention of midwives.Methods Forty midwives were chosen as research objects, and 40 maternity nurses were randomly chosen as the control group. Both groups were evaluated by the scales of fatigue condition, job burnout, coping styles, self-efficacy and turnover intention. The scores of dimensions of scales were compared between the two groups.Results The scores of body fatigue (5.27±1.69), mental fatigue (3.40±1.35) and total scores(8.68±1.52) of fatigue in the midwife group were obviously higher than those in the maternity nurse group (4.36±1.51, 2.70±1.14, 7.06±1.33, P<0.05). The scores of emotional exhaustion (28.46±5.80) and depersonification (7.98±3.40) in the midwife group were higher than those in the maternity nurse group (24.68±4.35, 6.52±2.77, P<0.05), while the score of personal accomplishment (31.42±3.71) in the midwife group was lower than that in the maternity nurse group (33.74±4.15, P<0.05). The scores of positive response (30.25±3.52) and self-efficacy (25.19±5.08) in the midwife group were lower than those in the maternity nurse group (32.04±3.67, 28.30±4.42, P<0.05), while the scores of negative coping (33.65±3.69) and turnover intention (14.37±2.91) in the midwife group were higher than those in the maternity nurse group (31.39±2.50, 12.18±2.64, P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with maternity nurses, the midwives have lower levels of self-efficacy and coping styles, higher levels of fatigue condition and job burnout, and a stronger turnover intention.

Key words： midwife job burnout turnover intention self-efficacy cross-sectional investigation

Received: 22 January 2018

PACS:

R192.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Ye Lixia

Cite this article:

Ye Lixia. Cross-sectional investigation analysis on fatigue condition, job burnout and turnover intention of midwives[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(5): 364-366.

URL:

http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2018.05.016 OR http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/Y2018/V25/I5/364

[1] 朱玲娇.助产士助产护理对产妇分娩质量的影响研究[J].中国医院统计,2014,21(1):30-31.
[2] 江秀敏.助产士自我效能感与职业倦怠的研究进展[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2016,22(4):16-19.
[3] 陈妙虹,程舒媛,林静君,等.广州市某三甲医院合同护士疲劳与职业压力的调查报告[J].卫生研究,2011,40(4):535-537.
[4] CHEN SK. Clinical psychology nursing guide[M]. Science and Technology Document Publishing House, 2000:207-219.
[5] 王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40.
[6] 谭建梨,林丽红,胡静.助产士压力与离职意愿相关性研究[J].中外医疗,2014(19):169-171.
[7] 李立梅,李淑兰,姜梅,等.北京地区助产士工作倦怠与自我效能现状及相关性分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(24):3457-3461, 3462.
[8] 康健.产房护士工作压力源、自我效能感与工作倦怠的研究[D].南京: 南京中医药大学,2011.
[9] 雷玉妃,吕琦玲,曹剑英.助产士在优质护理服务中自我效能感及工作压力来源调查分析[J].白求恩医学杂志,2015,13(1):54-55.
[10]赵书峰,滕志香.山东省公立医院护理人员离职意愿调查[J].中国医院统计,2012,19(5):353-356.
[11]王惠明,贾娟娟.助产士疲劳状况、工作倦怠及应对方式的相关性研究[J].全科护理,2013,11(30):2844-2846.
[12]贾娟娟,王惠明.合肥市三级医院助产士工作倦怠与应对方式的相关性研究[J].长治医学院学报,2013,27(4):260-263.
[13]贾彩丽.北京市城区助产士离职意愿的调查分析[J].护理研究,2012,26(12):1088-1089.
[14]邓阳丹.助产士离职意愿的相关因素分析和对策[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(16):185-185.
[15]王嵩,李士雪.医疗公共卫生管理存在的问题及对策[J].滨州医学院学报,2016,39(6):439-441.