|
|
|
| Effect of motivational interview combined with procedural health education management on drug compliance of patients with mental depression |
| Ding Zhujie, Li Yun, Cai Minke |
| Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of motivational interview combined with procedural health education management on drug compliance of patients with mental depression.Methods The patients with mental depression were randomly divided into two groups, 72 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional health education model, and the observation group was managed with the combination of motivational interview and procedural health education. Drug compliance and depression degree of patients were compared and the differences were analyzed.Results Before management, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). After management, the drug compliance of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (score of compliance: 26.94 ±3.47 in the observation group and 21.67 ±2.93 in the control group with t=9.85and P<0.001; the drug compliance rate: 84.72 in the observation group and 66.67 the control group with χ2=6.38 and P=0.01). The depression degree of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (HAMD score: 6.25 ±0.41 in the observation group, and 9.36 ±1.48 in the control group, with t=17.18 and P＜0.001; SDS score: 35.36±3.28 in the observation group and 43.26 ±3.87 in the control group, with t=13.21 and P＜0.001). The difference value between the scores before and after management of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (the difference value of drug compliance score: 7.11 ±1.02 in the observation group, and 3.27 ±0.38 in the control group with t=29.93 and P＜0.001; the difference value of HAMD score: 7.23±0.95 in the observation group and 4.62 ±0.52 in the control group with t=20.45 and P＜0.001; the difference value of SDS score: 11.21 ±1.06 in the observation group and 6.40 ±0.99 in the control group, with t=28.14 and P＜0.001). The difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Motivation interview combined with procedural health education management can effectively enhance the drug compliance of patients and alleviate the depression degree of patients with mental depression.
|
|
Received: 16 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王桂梅,沈蕾,谢红芬,等.社区抑郁症患者的照顾者心理健康状况质性研究[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(3):42-45.
[2] 邹陈君, 张应忠, 刘之旺, 等. 老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害程度及其影响因素分析[J].中国医院统计,2017,24(1):34-36.
[3] 张红.精神护理干预模式对老年抑郁症患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(17):41-43.
[4] 代金枝.动机性访谈对自杀意念的抑郁症患者抑郁水平和自杀意念的影响[J].现代临床护理,2017,16(8):20-24.
[5] 童淑萍.护理程序的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(11):1056.
[6] 施忠英,王丽霞,孔庆芳,等.在抑郁症患者康复管理中应用支持型自我管理模式的效果评价[J].中国护理管理,2018,18(2):236-240.
[7] 罗娟,胡启梅,徐芸,等.主动式社区护理干预在抑郁症患者康复中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(3):37-40.
[8] 吴进纯,肖明朝,赵庆华,等.园艺疗法对抑郁症患者生活质量及社会功能的影响[J].中国护理管理,2018,18(1):48-51.
[9] 李彦博,刘庆奇,黄晓玉,等.开放式管理对住院抑郁症患者康复的影响[J].中国医院统计,2017,24(3):204-206.
[10]高彩霞,张利宁,郭小平.心理疏导和精神护理对老年抑郁症患者SAS、SDS评分及护理满意度的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2018,15(2):220-222. |
| [1] |
Chen Xiaofang, Kong Limin, Yang Yuyan. Clinical features and health education analysis of patients with chemotherapy by PICC of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Wenzhou[J]. journal1, 2018, 25(6): 441-443. |
| [2] |
Huang Jin, Hu Mengmeng, Chen Xiaojie. Application of network management intervention combined with health education management in elderly patients with bronchial asthma[J]. journal1, 2017, 24(6): 428-431. |
| [3] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(5): 380-381. |
| [4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2017, 24(5): 372-373. |
| [5] |
Zhang Zhongwen, Shi Dewen, Dong Xiufen, Xuan Haiyan, Zhang Feng, Zhong Shaoxin. Investigation of prevention action and influencing factors of respiratory diseases among college students of Shandong Province[J]. journal1, 2016, 23(6): 406-408. |
| [6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2016, 23(5): 381-382. |
|
|
|
|
