食管异物并发症的影响因素分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2016.01.010

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (910 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the related factors of complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs), and to lower the incidence of complications and improve treatment efficacy. Methods From May 1997 to September 2014, 414 cases with EFBs at our hospital were enrolled in the study group. Using the patients with complications as the subjects and patients with no complications as the controls, a case-control study was designed to compare the differences between their characteristics and treatments. Applying multivariate conditional logistic analysis, we probed the risk factors of complications. Results Of all the 414 cases, 60 (15.0%) individuals appeared esophageal mucosa injury and 22 (5.3%) individuals appeared esophageal perforation. Multivariate conditional logistic analysis indicated that type of EFBs and duration of impaction were associated with complications in patients with EFBs (P＜0.01). Compared to animal bone, date pit was more likely to cause complications (OR=3.016,95%CI=1.578-5.763). It also showed that the interval time from impaction to seeking medical care was the related factor of complications. Patients who saw a doctor after more than 48 hours were more easily to arise complications (OR=2.186,95%CI=1.134-4.213). For subjects, the ratio of surgical treatment was higher than controls (P＜0.01). Compared to controls, subjects improved the feeding (P＜0.05) and shortened the time of length of stays and postoperative recovery by about two days, respectively. Conclusion Patients with EFBs should seek hospital treatment as soon as possible. Clinical doctors should consider various data, especially type of EFBs and interval time. Accurate treatment and selective surgery may prevent serious complications and shorten the time of postoperative recovery and length of stays.

Key words： esophageal foreign body complication perforation therapy

Received: 25 September 2015

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5253.2016.01.010 OR http://manu58.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgyytj/EN/Y2016/V23/I1/31

[1] 赵绯,张亚梅.83例小儿特殊食管异物及并发症的处理[J].重庆医学,2010,39(3):350-351.
[2] LONGSTRETH GF, LONGSTRETH KJ,YAO JF. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001, 53(2): 193-198.
[3] EISEN GM, BARON TH, DOMINITZ JA, et al. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002,55(7):802-806.
[4] 高尚志,程邦昌,涂仲凡,等.食管骨性异物所致并发症的处理[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2005,21(2):111-112.
[5] 刘翔,彭解人,郑亿庆,等.食管异物致食管穿孔并大出血1例[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2003,17(7):438.
[6] PENCINA MJ, D′AGOSTINO RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation[J]. Stat Med,2004,23:2109-2123.
[7] 章毅,王敏,古艳,等.301例食管异物患者临床诊治分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2013,19(4):322-324.
[8] 陈净华,张凯扬,黄晓华.老年患者食管异物临床诊治分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2015,21 (1):67-68.
[9] 石建华.引发食管异物并发症的危险因素[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,18(12):758-759.
[10]路国涛,王玉欣,梁钰,等.成年患者食管异物临床特点分析256例[J].世界华人消化杂志,2012,20(29):2818-2821.
[11]闫秀娥,周丽雅,林三仁,等.101例食管异物并发症的影响因素及软式内镜治疗效果分析[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(32):2557-2561.
[12]赵晋波,田丰,汪键,等.食管异物需手术干预的危险因素分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2011,14(9):709-710.
[13]梅天璐,徐樨巍,王国丽,等.儿童消化道异物277例分析[J].北京医学, 2015,37(11):1087-1088.
[14]邓晶,盛成,殷鹏,等.颈段食管异物穿孔诊治[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2015,22(11):593-594.
[15]包春华.气管异物和食道异物原因分析及预防措施[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(19):128-139.