|
|
Study on the difference of postoperative pain status of lung cancer treated by combined intravenous anesthesia and general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia |
HAN Nianping |
Anesthesia Department,Juye County People's Hospital,Heze 274900, P.R.China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the difference of postoperative pain status of lung cancer with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) combined with general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia (CGEA).Methods A total of 91 patients with lung cancer who underwent surgical treatment were randomly divided into the TIVA group (45 cases) and the CGEA group (46 cases).In the TIVA group, midazolam 0.04 to 0.06 mg/Kg was intravenously administered intravenously;0.4 to 0.6 μg/Kg of sufentanil,0.15 mg/Kg of atracurium cis-benzensulfonate,and 1.0 mg/Kg of propofol.After induction of anesthesia was completed, laryngoscope tracheal intubation was performed and mechanical ventilation was performed. Maintenance of anesthetic method:A micropump was pumped with atracurium sulfoxamate 2 ug/(Kg·min), propofol 5 mg/(Kg·h), and remifentanil 0.15 μg/(Kg·min).CGEA group:Induction of anesthesia was the same as above.T7-T8 disc space was selected as the puncture site.Epidural puncture was performed and an epidural catheter was placed.Anesthesia was maintained. 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride was administered through the catheter every 30 minutes.Dosing once,5 mL each time.Results The patients in the CGEA group were superior to the TIVA group in terms of extubation time and recovery time.The incidence of infection was lower in the CGEA group than in the TIVA group. The scores in the CGAA group were better than those in the TIVA group at 5 hours and 10 hours after the operation.Conclusion The choice of CGEA anesthesia for lung cancer patients can effectively improve postoperative pain and reduce complications.
|
Received: 12 September 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈鑫,骆洪雁,高晶,等.肺癌细胞株侧群细胞的分选及干细胞特性的鉴定[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2018(3):209-213. [2] 毕翻利,高洁,党璐.不同麻醉方式对早期肺癌术后感染率及疼痛状态的影响[J].湖南师范大学学报,2018,15(2):67-69. [3] 张晓敏.全麻复合硬膜外阻滞麻醉的术中观察与护理[J].当代临床医刊,2017,30(5):3374,3360. [4] 王成连,雷恩骏.芬太尼透皮贴剂复合硬膜外超前镇痛对肺癌患者术后疼痛影响的临床研究[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(13):17-22. [5] 王薇,刘素兰.芬太尼透皮贴剂联合自控静脉镇痛对腹部手术后疼痛程度应激程度的影响[J].安徽医学,2017,38(8):1055-1058. [6] 杨静,夏氢,何伟.胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术后疼痛程度、应激反应、免疫应答的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2018,24(3):357-360. [7] 胡祚铭.椎管内麻醉方法及并发症研究新进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(67):48-49. [8] 林毅.全麻与全麻复合硬膜外阻滞用于开胸手术的对比研究[J].重庆医学, 2015, 34(4):538-539. [9] 王丽珺,仓静,薛张纲.不同麻醉方式对开胸患者术后并发症的影响[J].中国临床医学,2011,18(2):230-233. [10] Yeung J,Melody T,Kerr A,et al.Randomised controlled pilot study to investigate the effectiveness of thoracic epidural and paravertebral blockade in reducing chronic post-thoracotomy pain:TOPIC feasibility study protocol[J].BMJ Open,2016,6(12):e012735. [11] 张倩,尤浩军.超前镇痛研究进展及麻醉中应用[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2016,22(4):241-244. [12] 赵而飞,武咏,张学林.老年患者不同麻醉方式下腹部良性肿瘤切除术后肺部感染情况分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2016,30(8):826-828. |
|
|
|