|
|
The clinical observation of handling the early thickness soft tissue infection after post-operative fractureof lower limb with filling in PVA foam |
TIAN Xiue1, CHENG Shuai2, REN Qiang3, WANG Jianming3 |
1 Binzhou Medical University Hospital Operation Room,Binzhou 256603,P.R.China; 2 Dongying Municipal People's Hospital; 3 Binzhou Medical University Hospital Bone&Joint Surgery |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical observation of handling the early full thickness soft tissue infection after fracture of lower limb after open reduction and internal fixation with filling in medical PVA foam with the anatomic level layered.Methods 52 cases in patients of early full thickness soft tissue infections after fracture of lower limb after open reduction and internal fixation with stage I were all treatment for stratified filling tube with medical PVA foam pouring out negative pressure closed drainage, after sealing the infusion,deep intermittent perfusion,shallow the negative pressure drainage,later from deep to shallow,withdrawal the medical PVA foam with tube layer by layer,the final closure of the wound.Results Most of the patients with sepsis rapidly control,visible fresh granulation tissue to grow in 6-7 days,14~21 days to destroy deep dead space,granulation tissue covering the bone sections,21-28 days of shallow soft tissues closed wound.During the 2-3 years of follow-up,51patients were cured the infection,fracture healing,1 cases of patients with late infection delayed healing,be cured after removing the implants with bone transport.Conclusions Layered filling medical PVA foam with tube filling vacuum sealing drainage treatment of early full thickness soft tissue infection post-operative fracture of lower limb with good effect.For each layer of tissue,less tamponade,less destructive,sinus formation is reduced, shorten the course of treatment, can deal with the early full thickness soft tissue infection after steel plate screw internal fixation of femoral fracture, avoid osteomyelitis or even amputation.
|
Received: 20 March 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 朱力,项炜,刘宁,等.VSD在下肢创伤感染患者中应用的性价比调查[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2015,24(10):1176-1178. [2] 孙晓辉.VSD治疗骨科创伤感染的临床效果观察[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(33):418-419. [3] 叶松林,陈立,覃晓峰,等.封闭式负压引流术联合游离植皮、皮瓣移植术治疗四肢难治性感染创面的效果及对疼痛的影响[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(2):109-112. [4] 王瑞国,荆兆峰,邵明伟.持续冲洗VSD一期闭合创腔与单纯VSD治疗软组织坏死及感染的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(1):100-101. [5] 史宝国,高观岚.VSD治疗40例骨科创伤感染的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(31):6,8. [6] 高洁,刘婷.VSD治疗30例骨科创伤感染的临床疗效探析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013(13):3042. [7] 陈海军,惠永峰.骨科创伤感染VSD治疗的临床疗效分析[J].中国现代医生,2012,50(25):149-150. [8] 闵廷瑜,高建军.封闭式负压引流技术在骨科创伤及感染创面中的应用[J].当代医学,2013,19(27):107-108. [9] 徐海栋,赵建宁,卢俊浩,等.创面敷料封闭负压引流治疗慢性创面[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(16):3026-3032. [10] 李靖,陈绍宗,李学拥,等.封闭负压引流技术对创面微循环流速和血管口径影响的实验研究[J].现代康复,2000,4(12):1848-1849. |
[1] |
. [J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2018, 41(2): 157-158. |
|
|
|
|