|
|
Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation combined with 1.8mm-incision phacoemulsification for refractoryglaucoma coexisting cataract |
MA Jianli, WANG Jibing, ZHANG Min, JIANG Yaqin |
Weifang Eye Hospital,Weifang 261041,P.R China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ahmed valve implantation combined with 1.8 mm-incision phacoemulsification in the treatment of patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma coexisting cataract.Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 21 consecutive patients with refractory glaucoma incorporated cataract who underwent a 1.8 mm-incision phacoemulsification combined with placement of an Ahmed valve implant.Control of intraocular pressure (IOP),pre-and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity,corneal curvature and the development of intra-and postoperative complications were evaluated during the follow-up.Results The mean follow-up was 11.7 months (range,8 to 21 months). Mean preoperative IOP was (37.9 ± 10.2) mmHg and mean postoperative IOP at the last visit was (14.3 ±5.8) mmHg (t=9.19,P<0.01).Two patients needed antiglaucoma medication.Postoperative visual acuity improved in all 21 eyes, and the best-corrected visual acuity in these eyes improved from (0.19±0.11) to (0.57 ±0.14) (t=11.45,P<0.01).The preoperative corneal curvature was (0.80±0.21) D while the postoperative corneal curvature was (0.78±0.3) D (t=0.19,P=0.85).The early complications occurred were transient hypotony with choroidal detachment in one case, which amended within 1 week and microscopic hyphema in 2 patients which disappeared the second day. The main late postoperative complication was an encapsulated bleb, which occurred in 2 patients and led to high IOP.Conclusion The combination of 1.8 mm-incision phacoemulsification combined with placement of an Ahmed valve implant is safe and effective in uncontrolled glaucoma incorporated cataract.
|
Received: 04 September 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Tang Y,Qian S,Wang J,et al.Effects of combined phacoemulsification and viscogoniosynechialysis versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma and coexisting cataract[J].Ophthalmologica,2012,228(3):167-173. [2] Chen Y H,Lu D W,Cheng J H,et al. Trabeculectomy in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma[J].J Glaucoma,2009,18(9):679-683. [3] Boey P Y,Narayanaswamy A,Zheng C,et al.Imaging of blebs after phacotrabeculectomy with Ologen collagen matrix implants[J].Br J Ophthalmol, 2011, 95(3):340-344. [4] Vass C,Menapace R.Surgical strategies in patients with combined cataract and glaucoma[J].Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2004,15(1):61-66. [5] Zhou M W,Wang W,Huang W B,et al.Adjunctive with versus without intravitreal bevacizumab injection before Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma[J].Chin Med J,2013,126(8):1412-1417. [6] Nassiri N,Kamali C,Rahnavardi M,et al.Ahmed glaucoma valve and single-plate Molteno implants in treatment of refractory glaucoma: a comparative study[J].Am J Ophthalmol, 2010,149(6):893-902. [7] 赵琪, 王慧珠.Ahmed青光眼阀植入术治疗新生血管性青光眼[J].国际眼科杂志,2011,11(1):130-132. [8] Gedde S J,Schiffman J C,Feuer W J,et al.Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2012,153(5):789-803. [9] Kaya M,Ozbek Z,Yaman A, et al. Long-term success of ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma[J].Int J Ophthalmol,2012,5(1):108-112. [10] Gedde S J,Herndon L W,Brandt J D,et al.Postoperative complications in the TUbe Vjrsus Trabeculectomy(TVT)study during five years of follow-up[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2012,153(5):804-814. [11] Alió J,Rodríguez-Prats J L,Galal A,et al.Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification[J].Ophthalmology,2005,112(11):1997-2003. [12] Jiang Y,Le Q,Yang J,et al.Changes in corneal astigmatism and high order aberrations after clear corneal tunnel phacoemulsification guided by corneal topography[J].J Refract Surg,2006,22 (9 Suppl):S1083-1088. [13] Guirao A,Redondo M,Geraghty E,et al.Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2002,120(9):1143-1151. [14] Holladay J T. Optical quality and refractive surgery[J].Int Ophthal mol Clin,2003,43(2):119-136. [15] Yao K,Tang X,Ye P.Corneal astigmatism,high order aberrations,and optical quality after cataract surgery:Microincision versus small-incision[J].J Refract Surg,2006,22(9 Suppl):S1079-1082. [16] Hayashi K,Yoshida M,Hayashi H.Postoperative corneal shape changes:Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery[J].J Cataract Surg,2009,35(2):233-239. [17] Li Z, Zhou M, Wang W,et al.A prospective comparative study on neovascular aucoma and non-neovascular refractory glaucoma following Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation[J].Chinese medical journal,2014,127 (8):1417-1422. [18] Shah A A,WuDunn D,Cantor L B.Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2000,129(4):455-460. [19] Schwartz K S,Lee R K,Gedde S J.Glaucoma drainage implants:a critical comparison of types[J].Curt Opin Ophthalmol,2006,17(2):181-189. |
[1] |
XIE Yingbin, WANG Qi, KAO Huating, SONG Bin, WANG Kang. Application of optic capture in microphthalmos congenital cataract surgery[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2018, 41(5): 354-358. |
[2] |
. [J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2018, 41(2): 143-144. |
[3] |
XU Chang, JIANG Yaqin, SHI Yuan, HUANG Xudong. Clinic effects on comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventionalphacoemulsification in patients with cataract[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2017, 40(5): 321-325. |
[4] |
. [J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2017, 40(5): 357-360. |
[5] |
. [J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2017, 40(5): 370-371. |
|
|
|
|